Harkness v. McClain
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and'from an order refusing a new trial. Tlie opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
BlacKbuen, J.:
This suit is brought by an indorsee against the payee and indorser. The complaint is in the usual form, except in the manner of alleging protest and notice, which is as follows: “That on the 27th day of May, 1890, the said note was duly protested for non-payment thereof, and said note is now wholly unpaid.” The defendant demurred on the ground, among other things, because the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and at the same time filed an answer. Ho answered a specific denial, and, further answering, says, “that at no time prior to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pangburn v. RamsayNew York Supreme Court · 1814
- Chapman v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1816
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Bush v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Hughes v. BeekleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927