Legal Opinion

Harkness v. McClain

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and'from an order refusing a new trial. Tlie opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

BlacKbuen, J.:

This suit is brought by an indorsee against the payee and indorser. The complaint is in the usual form, except in the manner of alleging protest and notice, which is as follows: “That on the 27th day of May, 1890, the said note was duly protested for non-payment thereof, and said note is now wholly unpaid.” The defendant demurred on the ground, among other things, because the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and at the same time filed an answer. Ho answered a specific denial, and, further answering, says, “that at no time prior to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pangburn v. RamsayNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  2. Chapman v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1816

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bush v. BushUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hughes v. BeekleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API