Legal Opinion

United States v. Halle Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1932No. 3562Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Certain jig-saw puzzles, consisting of 100 pieces each, were imported at the port of Cleveland, Ohio, and were classified bv the collector as *282tpys under the following portion of paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930:

Par. 1513. * * * all other toys, and parts of toys, not specially provided for, 70 per centum ad valorem. As used in this paragraph the term “toy ” means an article chiefly used for the amusement of children, whether or not also suitable for physical exercise or for mental development.

The protest of the importer claimed the goods to be dutiable under paragraph 412 of said act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BorgfeldtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. StoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API