Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Burgess

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 2, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Bill in Equity for partition.

1Opinion of the CourtMatteson, C. J.

The main issue in this suit is as to the title to the land described in the bill of which partition is sought.

The conveyances on which the title depends are as follows : „ On October 30, 1S48, Mary Eeynolds, then seized in fee of the land, conveyed it in fee to Samuel J. Eeynolds, who, by deed of that date, mortgaged it back to the grantor, to secure the payment of his note for five hundred dollars, payable in ten years with interest.’

On March 17, 1851, Samuel J. Eeynolds, by deed of that date, conveyed the land in fee to George H. Eeynolds. This deed was the usual short form of warranty…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metts v. BB REALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Lewicki v. MarszalkowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Zalobowski v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  4. Star Enterprise v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
  5. Zalobowski v. New England Teamsters & Trucking Industry Pension FundSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API