Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Preu

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 13, 1911Published

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Voorhees, J.

This is the plaintiff’s rule to show cause why a verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted. The action was brought by the assignee of certain brokers to recover, on an account stated, the sum of $6,267.20, the balance due upon the purchase and sale of stocks. The verdict was for the defendant.

The account appears to have been opened in September, 1908, with Trippe, Thompson & Company, and on December 31st, 1909, by the written order of the defendant, the account was transferred to Trippe & Company, the successors of the former…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WilliamsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  2. Kendall v. FriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API