Harper v. Cunningham
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Hearing on an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment on a verdict directed by the court in a proceeding by sci. fa. to revive a judgment. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
This is a proceeding upon a writ of scire facias to revive judgment; and it is the second time that the case has been before us. In our opinion on the former appeal, 5 App. D. C. 203, the circumstances that gave rise to the proceeding are fully stated, and need not be here repeated. Upon the plea of mil tid record interposed by the appellee William Cunningham, defendant in the court below, and issue joined thereon, and the submission of the cause to the court below upon such issue joined, that court found in favor of the defendant, and thereupon entered judgment in his favor. The plaintiff,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hall v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lomax v. SpriggsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Tate v. KelleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957