O'Brien v. Dickinson Drug Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PEAIRS, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from an order of the court granting a new trial after verdict of the jury for damages for personal injuries.
The facts alleged by plaintiffs were that Julia H. 0 ’Brien, one of the plaintiffs, went to the drug-store of defendant and after making a purchase attempted to enter the ladies’ toilet, but finding it occupied was directed by the porter to the “Gents’ Toilet,” situated at the head of a cellar stairway, and that not being warned of danger she fell down a short flight of steps and was injured. The defendant alleges that when the plaintiff found the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Weringer v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.