Legal Opinion

O'Brien v. Dickinson Drug Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1927No. Docket No. 4674Published

1Opinion of the Court

PEAIRS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order of the court granting a new trial after verdict of the jury for damages for personal injuries.

The facts alleged by plaintiffs were that Julia H. 0 ’Brien, one of the plaintiffs, went to the drug-store of defendant and after making a purchase attempted to enter the ladies’ toilet, but finding it occupied was directed by the porter to the “Gents’ Toilet,” situated at the head of a cellar stairway, and that not being warned of danger she fell down a short flight of steps and was injured. The defendant alleges that when the plaintiff found the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ham v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of MotzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Weringer v. RutledgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API