Legal Opinion
Boutin v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 16, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company has "a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in an underlying action entitled Denizard v City of New York, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 8840/95, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated September 24, 1998, which denied its motion for summary judgment, and upon searching the record, declared that it has a duty to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in the underlying action.
Order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Engel v. LightermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Engel v. LichtermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Shaw Temple A.M.E. Zion Church v. Mount Vernon Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Facey v. HeywardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rosa v. Board of Examiners of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kopman v. Blue Ridge InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Capra v. Waldbaum's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- The Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, New York v. Arrowood Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022