Legal Opinion

Hampton v. Ewert

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 6, 1927No. 7514PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought in the District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma to recover the value of lead and zinc ore- removed from the allotment of one Mary 'J. Calf, a full-blood Quapaw Indian who died on or about December 7, 1912. The pleadings are of great length, and the object of the suit is thus well epitomized in the brief of appellants :

“It has for its purpose the cancellation of a certain contract for lead and zinc mining lease on said lands, as well as subsequent contracts in furtherance of the original contract, with the further purpose of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Iselin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Alabama Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. United States v. FinnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Pickering v. LomaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. R. v. McGinnis Theatres & Pay T. v. Inc. v. Video Independent Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Dixon v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1961
  4. Whitebird v. Eagle-Picher Lead Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Armstrong v. Maple Leaf Apartments, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API