Legal Opinion
City of Detroit v. Cristy
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1946No. Docket No. 2, Calendar No. 43,411PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Defendant, Laura H. Cristy, owner of parcel No. 25 appeals from an award made in condemnation proceedings in the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit to appropriate property as a site for the Memorial Hall.
The property owned by defendant has been used as a parking lot in ■ conjunction with other parcels of land. The assessed valuation of this parcel prior to 1935 was $13,600; from 1936 to 1938 it was $11,370, and from 1940 through 1945 it was $6,830. During the trial, defendant offered in evidence the assessment rolls of the city of Detroit ior the year 1945 for the purpose of showing that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas City & Grandview Railway Co. v. HaakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- City of New Orleans v. LarrouxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Commonwealth by State Highway Com. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Duggan v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Joyce v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in the County of Arlington, State of Virginia, and Howard W. SilsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Detroit/Wayne County Stadium Authority v. Drinkwater, Taylor & Merrill, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. StieferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Trad v. City of JacksonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.