Legal Opinion

CSX Transportation, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 19, 2006No. 05-16000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRYOR, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a question about state taxation of railroad properties that *1283was expressly left open by the Supreme Court of the United States, has since divided the federal appellate courts, and involves the traditional balance of federal and state power. We are asked to decide whether section 306 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (4-R Act or the Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11501, allows a railroad to challenge the methodology by which a state determines the true market value of railroad property for ad valorem tax purposes. The 4-R Act provides…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac R. Co. v. ForstCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Georgia State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Coastal Heart Med. Group, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API