Legal Opinion

M'Auley v. Billenger

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1822PublishedCited by 16 opinions

IN ERROR, on certiorari to a Justice’s Court. B., and the other defendants in error, sued M‘Auley before the Justice, to recover the first instalment of a sum sub- ’ scribed by him for the repairs of a church.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR, on certiorari to a Justice’s Court. B., and the other defendants in error, sued M‘Auley before the Justice, to recover the first instalment of a sum sub- ’ scribed by him for the repairs of a church. The defendants in error, at a meeting held at Union Church, in Danube, were appointed a committee to receive subscriptions, and to contract for the repairs of that church, in the manner specified m a written paper, the subscribers tó which pro-raised to pay to the committee, or either of them, the sums by them respectively subscribed, in four equal instalments, the first of which was to…

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error voluntarily entered

into a contract, by which he engagep to pay to the defendants in error, twenty-five dollars, for the purpose, and in the *90manner specified in the instrument to which he subscribed his name. The consideration for his promise was the repairing of tiie church. By signing the subscription, he sanctioned the acts of the meeting in resolving to make the repairs, and in the appointment of the committee for that purpose; and he, moreover, recognised the authority of the committee to receive the subscription money, and to contract "for the repairs. The only…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
  2. State v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Wilson v. Baptist Education SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Higert v. Trustees of Indiana Asbury UniversityIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Barnes v. PerineNew York Supreme Court · 1850

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API