Legal Opinion

Houssami v. Nofal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 25, 1991No. 90-503PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

In this negligence action, the parties assert that the primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly entered a directed verdict finding that workers’ compensation immunity protects the defendant, Robert C. Nofal. However, the determinative issue is whether the plaintiff, Ibrahim Houssami, proved that Nofal’s action, or inaction, was negligent.

Houssami was employed as a waiter at Churchill's Attic Restaurant in St. Augustine. Nofal and Herbert L. Smith owned the property and building where the restaurant was located, but Houssami was employed by Nofal-Smith, Inc.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of YohnSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Bovis v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Vandergriff v. VandergriffSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. Taylor v. Orlando ClinicDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. MacNeill v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Republic Financial Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. Powell v. Riverside Hospitality Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API