Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1987No. D.D. No. 86-34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re DerryberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. YoungOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re HeardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989