Legal Opinion

Peltz v. Schultes

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from surrogate’s court, Albany county. Action by John De Witt Feltz and Harriet Wagner, administrators de bonis non of Isaac H. Watson, deceased, against John A. Schultes and another, executors of Mary Watson, deceased, late surviving executrix of Isaac H„ Watson, deceased. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHerrick, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the surrogate of Albany county, requiring them as executors of Mary Watson, deceased, to account for the property that came into her hands as executrix of Isaac H. Watson, deceased. Some time in the year 1871, Isaac H. Watson, then a resident of Albany county, died, leaving a last will and testament, which was admitted to probate by the .surrogate of Albany county on the 6th *638day of June, 1871. On the same day, letters testamentary were issued -to John J. Canaday as executor and Mary Watson as executrix; they being so designated in the will.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement by ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. In re Hodgman's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of IrvinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Matson v. AbbeyNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Peltz v. SchultesNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API