Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1969No. Crim. 4699PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFriedman, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment after a jury found him guilty of violating Penal Code section 288. Essentially", the charge was sexual misconduct between defendant and L, his 13-year-old stepdaughter, and T, his 10-year-old stepson, on the night of November 6, 1966. The two children testified that on that night defendant had sexual relations with L and forced her into acts of oral copulation with him and T.

L testified that defendant had indulged in sexual relations with her for several years. N, the 18-year-old sister of L, no longer living in the home, testified that defendant had…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. VillatoroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. JamesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API