Legal Opinion

BC & L Pavement Services, Inc. v. Higgins

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2002No. 22,046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} BC & L Pavement Services, Inc. (BC & L) appealed the decision of Louis Higgins, State Purchasing Agent (Higgins), to affirm the decision of the State Purchasing Office. The State Purchasing Office rejected BC & L’s bid to provide materials and labor for certain treatments to paved surfaces at airports and accepted the bid of Interested Party-Respondent Dismuke Construction Company (Dismuke). BC & L was not licensed at the time of the bid, but obtained a license before the time of contact. Higgins denied BC & L’s protest, and the district court affirmed the denial.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Shawnee, Kansas, and Medevac Midamerica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bd. of Educ. of Carlsbad v. HarrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. New Mexico State Board of Psychologist Examiners v. LandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Gaming Control Board v. Ten (10) Gaming DevicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In re Hearing on the Merits Regarding Air Quality Permit No. 3135New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Rio Grande Chapter of the Sierra Club v. New Mexico Mining CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API