State ex rel. Cheren v. Cheren
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
Notwithstanding the differences between the mother and father concerning his access to the children he was required to support, section 61.18(4)(b), Florida Statutes (2004),1 precludes reliance on such matters to reduce accrued arrearages in child-support payments, as occurred below. See E.Z.P. v. H.P., Jr., 756 So.2d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Washington v. Fudge, 616 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs. v. Sandidge, 651 So.2d 1261 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); see also Hoffman v. Foley, 541 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
Moreover, the order under review…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Department of Revenue v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Onley v. OnleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Alvarez v. AlvarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Prio v. BarouhDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.