Legal Opinion
Bowdle v. Detroit Street Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Error to Wayne. (Frazer, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
1. The principal question in this case arises upon the following instruction of the court to the jury:
“I allowed this testimony to be introduced as to the mental condition of this woman for the purpose of showing you, or allowing you to judge, as to how long her husband might be deprived of her society, or of her labor as a wife, in the discharge of her domestic duties in the household, and for no other purpose. You are at liberty to investigate all the proof in this case that has been offered to you as to whether this woman is sane or insane. I charge you that, if you shall find that now…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Worthington & Co. v. MencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Mayor of Gainesville v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Mead v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Blair v. Seitner Dry Goods Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Commonwealth v. ReaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Gorton v. HarmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. HoughtelingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.