Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Skolinsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 9, 2010PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a probate proceeding, the objectants Maureen Barry, JoRita DeFrancesco, Daniel E Flynn, Robert J. Higgins, Fatricia M. Hornik, and Adrian Leahy appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Futnam County (Reitz, S.), dated January 22, 2009, as denied that branch of their motion pursuant to SCEA 1404 which was to compel the disclosure of certain documents.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondent and the intervenor- respondent.
Parties are entitled to disclosure of all matter “material and necessary” to prosecution of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vyas v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wadolowski v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Espinoza v. TejedaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Holloway v. Orthodox Church in Am.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Melworm v. Encompass Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Melworm v. Encompass Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.