Legal Opinion

Dady v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, John H. O’Rourke, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Kings County Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 30th day of December, 1901, denying said defendant’s motion to punish the plaintiff and the defendant, the Hamilton Trust Company, and the president of said company, for contempt of court in disobeying an order theretofore entered in the action, granting a stay of proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Willard Bartlett, J.:

The stay of proceedings which the respondents are alleged to have violated was contained in an order granted by Mr. Justice Maddox, requiring the plaintiff to show cause why all proceedings on his part and on the part of the Hamilton Trust Company should not be stayed pending an appeal from an order of. the Appellate Division affirming the judgment in this action. The stay was in these words: “ and until the hearing and determination of this motion let all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff and the defendant, Hamilton Trust Company, except the entering of an *558order…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Salvo Realty Corp. v. RosenkrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Levin v. Sol Levin Fixtures Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API