Legal Opinion
Converse v. Lottery Commission
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 27, 1989No. 23417-0-IPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
The Washington State Lottery Commission (Commission) appeals the trial court's order directing the Commission to pay Seattle-First National Bank (Seattle-First) the annual net prize payment of lottery winner Michael J. Converse. The Commission contends that the trial court's order approving Converse's voluntary assignment of his annual installment to Seattle-First as collateral for a business loan is not an "appropriate judicial order" within the meaning of RCW 67.70.100. We reverse.
The essential facts are not in dispute. In March of 1986, Converse won the Washington State Lottery. As the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Inland Empire Distribution Systems, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Washington Federation of State Employees v. State Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Anderson, Leech & Morse, Inc. v. Washington State Liquor Control BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Multicare Medical Center v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Lemieux v. Tri-State Lotto CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Walker v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Singer Friedlander Corp. v. State Lottery CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.