Mallo v. Pembleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, verdict reinstated, and judgment directed thereon in favor of plaintiff. Memorandum: We think the trial court committed error in directing that the verdict of $7,000 be set aside as excessive unless the plaintiff stipulated to reduce it to $4,000. No issue of liability is presented on this appeal. [[ Following a motor vehicle accident, plaintiff was hospitalized for four days, was required to be in bed at home for an additional seven days and was prevented from returning to work for some 13 days.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,164 Index Fund, Inc. v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Richards v. South Buffalo Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Kraft v. Carborundum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Schunk v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Staiano v. CronkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.