Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Isaac

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 2013No. Appellate Case No. 2013-001464; No. 27302Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Pleicones

I concur in the decision to dismiss this appeal because the Act does not apply retroactively and thus appellant is not entitled to invoke its protections. E.g. State v. Dawson, 402 S.C. 160, 740 S.E.2d 501(2013). I would hold, however, that a pretrial order denying immunity under the Act is immediately appealable under S.C.Code Ann. § 14-3-330(4) (Supp.2012) because it is in the nature of an injunction.7

The General Assembly, as is its prerogative, has codified and modified what was at common law a defense, and instructed that a person who establishes that defense may not be criminally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Columbia v. South Carolina Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. STATE RECORD CO., INC. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API