Legal Opinion

Kettell v. Johnson & Johnson

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 22, 1972No. LR-71-C-12PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EISELE, District Judge.

This case is properly brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The plaintiff, Otis Kettell, seeks reinstatement and back pay from his former employer, Johnson & Johnson. He alleges religious discrimination.

This opinion constitutes this Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Otis Kettell is a resident of the State of Arkansas. Johnson & Johnson is a New Jersey corporation, with its main office and principal place of business located in New Jersey. The defendant does business in the State of Arkansas as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robert Kenneth Dewey v. Reynolds Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  2. Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Jackson v. Veri Fresh Poultry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Larry G. HARDISON, Appellant, v. TRANS WORLD AIRLINES, INC., Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Brier Manufacturing Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  3. Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Shaffield v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
  5. Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Parks v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API