Legal Opinion

Lister v. Pennsylvania Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1909No. Appeal, No. 216Published

Appeal, No. 216, Oct. T., 1907, b.y defendant, from judgment of C. P. Blair Co., Oct. T., 1905, No. 110, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Robert McKinley Lister, by his father and next friend, Francis O. Lister, v. Pennsylvania Telephone Company. Motion for nonsuit. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

We have considered the questions sought to be raised by the assignments of error, and the oral and printed arguments of counsel relating to them, and are not convinced that any reversible error was committed. We will add to this expression of opinion upon the merits of the appeal no discussion of them, because we deem it our duty to sustain the appellee’s motion for nonsuit. Judgment was entered in the court below on November 4, 1907, and on November 25', the court made an order directing the stenographer to transcribe the notes of *322testimony and charge of the court. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farley v. Altoona & Logan Valley Electric Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API