Legal Opinion

Ostheimer v. United States

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 19319PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff, a life insurance agent authorized to act as special agent for the Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and to solicit for the Aetna Life Insurance Company, procured policies with Northwestern on the lives of his former partner, three key employees and his children, as well as one with Aetna on the life of his former partner. He brings this suit to recover the additional tax paid because of the inclusion in his income, by the revenue officials, of the commissions he received from the insurance companies by reason of the issuance of these policies.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. J. Ostheimer, 3rd, Ruth M. Ostheimer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Minzer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  3. Minzer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Minzer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API