Legal Opinion

WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of Troy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 2003No. Docket 211828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

Before: Markey, P.J., and Griffin and Talbot * , JJ. Per Curiam.

In our original opinion, this Court rejected plaintiffs constitutional challenge to MCL 211.34d(1)(b)(vii) and held that the statutory provision, as amended, was not unconstitutional. WPW Acquisition Co v Troy, 243 Mich App 260, 269; 620 NW2d 883 (2000). Thereafter, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that MCL 211.34d(1)(b)(vii) is unconstitutional because it is inconsistent with the meaning of the term “additions” as used in Const 1963, art 9, § 3, and remanded the case to this Court for consideration of an issue not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Wikman v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jeffrey v. Rapid American Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. WPW Acquisition Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Meadowbrook Village Associates v. City of Auburn HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Derderian v. Genesys Health Care SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Ammex, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Sierra Club MacKinac Chapter v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re the Wayne County Treasurer for ForeclosureMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Spranger v. City of WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API