Larsson v. City of Lake Oswego
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Lake Oswego’s decision not to modify an approval condition on a previously allowed minor partition. The city declined to eliminate the condition that petitioners agree not to pursue the city’s remonstrance procedure in connection with establishing a street improvement district in the vicinity of the partitioned property. We affirm.
Before addressing the merits, a preliminary matter requires comment. Petitioners’ brief in this case did not include a copy of LUBA’s opinion, as required by our rules. ORAP 5.50(3) and ORAP 4.60. As we…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Terraces Condominium Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Horizon Construction, Inc. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johns v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999