Legal Opinion

Larsson v. City of Lake Oswego

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 4, 1994No. 93-174; CA A83141PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA’s affirmance of the City of Lake Oswego’s decision not to modify an approval condition on a previously allowed minor partition. The city declined to eliminate the condition that petitioners agree not to pursue the city’s remonstrance procedure in connection with establishing a street improvement district in the vicinity of the partitioned property. We affirm.

Before addressing the merits, a preliminary matter requires comment. Petitioners’ brief in this case did not include a copy of LUBA’s opinion, as required by our rules. ORAP 5.50(3) and ORAP 4.60. As we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Terraces Condominium Ass'n v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Horizon Construction, Inc. v. City of NewbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Johns v. City of LincolnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API