United States v. Wilde
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT
(Docket No. 87)
EDWARD M. CHEN, United-States District Judge
On September 9, 2014, Defendant Mikal Xylon Wilde filed a motion to dismiss the Government’s indictment. Docket No. 87. In his motion, Wilde argues that the indictment must be dismissed because the classification of marijuana as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)1 violates his Fifth *1094Amendment rights. In his reply brief, Wilde also argues (for the first time) that the indictment must be dismissed because the “Government’s current enforcement policy”…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flack v. Wis. Dept. of Health Servs.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- United States v. PickardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
- United States v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- DOE VS. STATE, LEGISLATURE OF THE 77TH SESSIONNevada Supreme Court · 2017
- DOE VS. STATE, LEGISLATURE OF THE 77TH SESSIONNevada Supreme Court · 2017