Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilde

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 18, 2014No. CR-12-0144 EMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

(Docket No. 87)

EDWARD M. CHEN, United-States District Judge

On September 9, 2014, Defendant Mikal Xylon Wilde filed a motion to dismiss the Government’s indictment. Docket No. 87. In his motion, Wilde argues that the indictment must be dismissed because the classification of marijuana as a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA)1 violates his Fifth *1094Amendment rights. In his reply brief, Wilde also argues (for the first time) that the indictment must be dismissed because the “Government’s current enforcement policy”…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Flack v. Wis. Dept. of Health Servs.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
  2. United States v. PickardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  3. United States v. GreenDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
  4. DOE VS. STATE, LEGISLATURE OF THE 77TH SESSIONNevada Supreme Court · 2017
  5. DOE VS. STATE, LEGISLATURE OF THE 77TH SESSIONNevada Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API