Barwick v. Rouse
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by Division A. Writ of Eri’or to the Circuit Court for Wakulla. County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Cockrell, J.:
The action is in assumpsit upon promissory notes and the return of the sheriff upon the summons ad respondendum is as follows: “The within summons came to hand this 21st day of February, 1906' J. W. Smith, sheriff, and executed on 22nd day of February, 1906, by delivering a true copy on Mrs. Melvina Barwick, the wife of the within named James M. Barwick, this 24th day of February, 1906. J. W. Smith, Sheriff of said Wakulla county, Fla.” The summons was returnable March 5, 1906, on which day a default for want of appearance was entered reciting that service was had February 24th.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Minick v. MinickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Ortell v. OrtellSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- State Ex Rel. Palmer v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Bank of Jasper v. First Nat. Bank of RomeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.