Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Purcell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. 26066PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Corpus Juris-Cyc. References: Lis Pendens, 38CJ, p. 51, n. 51; p. 52, n. 55; Tenancy in Common, 38Cyc, p. 66, n. 71; p. 72, n. 84, 90 New. As to liability of cotenant to account for use and occupation or rents and profits, see annotation in 28 L.R.A. 829; 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 224; 7 R.C.L. 836. The appellant, Pennington, appeals from a decree sustaining a demurrer to his bill filed for the purpose of determining the question of whether or not a deed of trust held by him on an undivided interest in certain lands was superior to the lien of one cotenant for use and occupation by another cotenant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burns v. DreyfusMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Morgan v. LongMississippi Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennington v. PurcellMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ford v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Griffin v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API