Legal Opinion

McGahren v. Mosier

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1913No. Appeal, No. 24PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 24, March T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Luzerne Co., Dec. T., 1910, No. 684, on verdict for plaintiff in case of John McGahren v. Frank C. Mosier. Assumpsit'for professional services. Before Strauss, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $441.75. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in refusing binding instructions for defendant.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The plaintiff, a member of the bar of Luzerne county, brought this action of assumpsit against the defendant and others named in the record, to recover for professional services rendered by him in a proceeding in which all of the named parties were interested, as petitioners in a proceeding in the court of common pleas of Luzerne county, in condemnation of certain real estate by a railroad company, the title to which was in these defendants. Miss R. Laura Cannon, a member of bar, originally represented the parties, and as alleged by the plaintiff, at the instance and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thole v. MartinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Pusey v. Thomas McCaffrey Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API