Legal Opinion · Dissent

The Matter of the Estate of Edmund Felix Hennel , , Also Known as Edmund Hennel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 2017No. 78Published

1DissentWilson, J.

I am in the odd position of endorsing everything in the majority’s opinion except the result. Instead of reversing, the matter should be remitted to the Appellate Division for resolution of the Surrogate’s Court’s alternative holding — that decedent’s estate was obligated to satisfy the mortgage as a “just debt.” The Appellate Division expressly bypassed that issue because of its holding for petitioners on promissory estoppel grounds.

The first article of decedent’s last will and testament directs the executor to make “payment of any and all just debts.” In Surrogate’s Court, petitioners…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GarofaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. FishmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. In re the Estate of HennelNew York Surrogate's Court · 2013
  4. Lennard v. Mendik Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API