Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Seamans
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 9, 1974No. Civ. A. 74-178PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GESELL, District Judge.
This action seeks $3,500,000 in compensatory and punitive damages resulting from an alleged conspiracy among various Government officials to deprive plaintiff of his Government job and to violate his constitutional rights. The matter comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Several defenses are raised, including the statute of limitations, the doctrine of official immunity, the claim that the administrative remedy before the Civil Service Commission is exclusive, and various procedural…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- A. Ernest Fitzgerald v. Robert C. Seamans, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.