Legal Opinion

Potter v. Schlesser Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 2000No. 9710-08216; CA A105159PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant on plaintiffs claim for damages on the attorney’s lien statute, ORS 87.445, and from the denial of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on that claim. The trial court entered an ORCP 67 B judgment in defendant’s favor on the claim. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff had no recourse against defendant under ORS 87.445. Because we conclude that the statutory scheme for the creation and enforcement of an attorney’s lien provides plaintiff with no cause of action against defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StearnsOregon Supreme Court · 1906
  2. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Adams v. Transamerica Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In Re Grimes' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Crawford v. CraneOregon Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Potter v. Schlesser Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API