Legal Opinion
Tobias v. Kwiatek
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 24, 1983No. Civ. Nos. 82-128, 80-273PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL; MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS
HOLDEN, District Judge.
The questions presented derive from various motions by the defendants to compel discovery of a large number of documents related to Perma-Chrome, Inc. (“PermaChrome”), a Vermont corporation begun by the individual plaintiff in this action.
It appears from the pleadings that David C. Tobias, the plaintiff, and Alfred Kwiatek and Arthur Berman, the defendants, are the three equal and only shareholders of Jonergin Vermont, Inc. (“Jonergin Vermont”), a Vermont corporation. This company is the holding company for an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Jack S. MacHin v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- B. Riley McClelland v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Empire of Carolina, Inc. v. MackleDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
- Collins v. MullinsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1996