McAllister v. McAllister
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CROTHERS, Justice,
specially concurring.
[¶ 29] I concur in the result based on what I believe is the majority’s careful, albeit expanding, application of our precedent. By definition that precedent consists of ad hoc adjudication of third-party claims for child custody or visitation. I write separately to express concern that our body of law being propagated ad judi-cium has resulted, and will continue to result, in the judiciary being pulled deep into the legislature’s policymaking domain.
[¶ 30] We know without citation to authority that adult relationships sometimes disintegrate and that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- E.N.O. v. L.M.M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Hust v. HustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Downtowner, Inc. v. Acrometal Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Mansukhani v. PailingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.