Beasley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. “ In an action for the recovery of damages on account of a conversion, proof of a demand and a refusal is only required as evidence of the conversion; and where the conversion is shown by other evidence, such proof is not essential.” Merchants & Miners Trans. Co. v. Moore, 124 Ga. 482 (52 S. E. 802).
2. “ Any distinct act of dominion wrongfully asserted over another’s propperty in denial of his right, or inconsistent with it, is a conversion. It is unnecessary to show that the defendant applied it to his own use, if he exercised dominion over it in defiance of the owner’s right, or in a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. Moore & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Chapman v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rogers v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Hoxie v. Americus Automobile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Wilcox v. Citizens Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Williams v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Herndon v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924