Legal Opinion

Beasley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1923No. 13732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “ In an action for the recovery of damages on account of a conversion, proof of a demand and a refusal is only required as evidence of the conversion; and where the conversion is shown by other evidence, such proof is not essential.” Merchants & Miners Trans. Co. v. Moore, 124 Ga. 482 (52 S. E. 802).

2. “ Any distinct act of dominion wrongfully asserted over another’s propperty in denial of his right, or inconsistent with it, is a conversion. It is unnecessary to show that the defendant applied it to his own use, if he exercised dominion over it in defiance of the owner’s right, or in a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CurlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  2. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. Moore & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Flannery v. HarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Chapman v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Hoxie v. Americus Automobile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  3. Wilcox v. Citizens Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Williams v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Herndon v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API