Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Cynthia Peed v. Cherie Lesaicherre, Cherie P. Lesaicherre, Dds, LLC, Dachiell A. Rowdon, Trustee of the Dachiell A. Rowdon Exempt Trust, Jon S. D'azzo, Trustee of the Jon Sheffield D'Azzo Exempt Trust, and Abc Insurance Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 2024No. 2024-CA-0263Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CYNTHIA PEED * NO. 2024-CA-0263 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL CHERIE LESAICHERRE, * FOURTH CIRCUIT CHERIE P. LESAICHERRE, DDS, LLC, DACHIELL A. * STATE OF LOUISIANA ROWDON, TRUSTEE OF THE DACHIELL A. ROWDON * EXEMPT TRUST, JON S. D'AZZO, TRUSTEE OF THE * JON SHEFFIELD D'AZZO ******* EXEMPT TRUST, AND ABC INSURANCE COMPANY JCL LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART, DISSENTS IN PART, AND ASSIGNS REASONS I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. While the majority applies the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act (“LMMA”) to Ms. Peed’s claims in their entirety, I find the petition sets forth claims that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. DenoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- LaCoste v. Pendleton Methodist Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Pryor v. Iberia Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Brandi Billeaudeau, Veronica Billeaudeau, and Joseph Billeaudeau v. Opelousas General Hospital Authority, Dr. Kondilo Skirlis-Zavala, and the Shumacher Group of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
- Blevins v. Hamilton Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.