Legal Opinion

In re Nomination Petition of Shannon

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1990No. 107 Misc. Dkt. 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARRY, Senior Judge.

Mary Jane Kopicki (Kopicki) filed timely objections to the nomination petition of Randa Shannon (Shannon), who filed as a candidate for the office of senator in the general assembly for the 38th senatorial district in the 1990 primary election. Kopicki is a registered Democratic elector in the 38th senatorial district. This opinion is in support of the order entered on March 27, 1990, setting aside Randa Shannon’s nomination petition.

To be placed on the ballot, Shannon had to submit a nomination petition containing the valid signatures of 500 Democratic electors…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross Nomination PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. In Re the Nomination Petition of KloiberCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Martin Nomination PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. In re Nomination Petition of DeFinoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. In re Nomination Petition of McDermottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Referendum Petition to Amend the City of Pittsburgh Home Rule CharterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In Re the Nomination Papers of MannCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. In re Nomination of Duncan-ThompsonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API