Legal Opinion

Neel, Insurance Commissioner v. Cann

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 11, 1945No. Appeal, 117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

This appeal is brought by the plaintiff from the order of the court below, dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction on the part of the alderman before whom the action was first instituted and from whose judgment the defendant appealed. The sole question raised is whether the amount in controversy exceeded the alderman’s statutory jurisdiction.

The Keystone Indemnity Exchange was a reciprocal insurance exchange organized under the laws of Pennsylvania. During the period beginning July 2,1929, and ending February 2, 1933, the Exchange issued eight policies of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murdy v. McCutcheonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  2. Collins v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  3. Commonwealth v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Paulson v. EisenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Knautt v. MassingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fantastic Plastics, Inc. v. FlahertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Ryder v. Prospect Park Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Wolfe v. SocashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Crichfield Oil & Gas Co. v. Grosky, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1948
  5. Fiedler v. Rebicek, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API