Legal Opinion
Wisnowski v. City of Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for injuries she allegedly sustained when she fell on a sidewalk in the City of Syracuse. Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment to defen*1070dant City of Syracuse (City). The City met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof in admissible form that prior written notice of the allegedly defective condition of the sidewalk was not actually given to the Commissioner of Public Works, as required by section 8-115 (1) of the Charter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drzewiecki v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Dabbs v. City of PeeksvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lalley v. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gorman v. Town of HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hall v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cruz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Horst v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Sorrento v. DuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.