Legal Opinion

Slurszberg v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 11, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ackerson, S. C. C.

The first amended complaint herein having been previously stricken out upon motion, the defendant now moves to strike the second amended complaint upon the grounds that it is frivolous; shows no right, title or interest in the plaintiffs to the cash surrender value of the insurance policy upon which the action is based, and that the proceeds of said policy are exempt from the claims of creditors.

The second amended complaint discloses that on May 5th, 1925, the defendant company issued its policy of insurance on the life of Thomas Sluberski in the sum of $5,000, payable to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. City of LouisvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Hiscock v. MertensSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. G. P. Farmer Coal & Supply Co. v. AlbrightNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
  4. Merrell Drug Co. v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Baranovich v. HorwattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. SalernoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1963
  3. McMahon v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1959
  4. In Re BeckmanDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1943
  5. United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API