Legal Opinion
Bratka v. Anheuser-Busch Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 11, 1995No. C2-93-694PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion For Default Judgment And Motion To Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Held In Contempt. Plaintiff asserts that defendant has violated this Court’s previous discovery order of July 13, 1994 in which defendant was ordered to produce documents relevant to plaintiffs claim.
In this civil action, plaintiff James Bratka (“Bratka”) asserts claims of bodily injury against his employer Anheuser-Busch Company, Inc. (“Anheuser-Busch”) under state law alleging that he was injured in the course of his employment as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Bank One of Cleveland, N.A. v. AbbeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Jessica S. Taylor, Minor Pamela J. Taylor and Richard Taylor, Plaintiffs v. Medtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sun River Energy, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Laukus v. Rio Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
- Hagemeyer North America, Inc. v. Gateway Data Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Younes v. 7-Eleven, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Shapiro v. Plante & Moran, LLP (In Re Connolly North America, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.