Doherty v. Mahoney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified in accordance with memorandum and, as modified, affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We agree with Special Term’s determination that there was showing of irregularities in sufficiently large "number to establish the probability that the result would be changed by a shift in, or invalidation of, the questioned votes” to warrant a new primary election (Matter of Ippolito v Power, 22 NY2d 594, 597, 598; Matter of Santucci v Power, 33 AD2d 517, affd 25 NY2d 897.) There is no authority, however, for the court’s direction that the new election for these three city-wide…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ippolito v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Santucci v. PowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Branagan v. ToddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- MATTER OF BRANAGAN v. ToddNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Santucci v. PowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doherty v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977