Legal Opinion

McPhee v. Coombe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The determination of re*979spondent that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.12 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]), which prohibits the use of a controlled substance, is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 138; Matter of Perez v Coombe, 226 AD2d 1131). We have reviewed petitioner’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit (see, Matter of McPhee v Coombe, 233 AD2d 963, lv dismissed 89 NY2d 1026). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lahey v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Perez v. CoombeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API