Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Bay City

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Bay Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Marston, J.:

Defendant in error brought an action of assumpsit to recover the agreed price for a quantity of dirt sold and delivered under ,an express contract, made by its street commissioner with plaintiff in error.

^Plaintiff in error in this court assumes, and upon this he bases his argument, that the city, for the purpose of paving one of its streets, lowered the grade thereof, and in doing so it became necessary to make excavations and remove a large quantity of tbe earth in the street, which, not being needed for city purposes, was sold to plaintiff in error and others. Upon the trial…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of San Antonio v. MullalyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Aldrich v. PaineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. Village of Kalkaska v. Shell Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Shimmons v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Jacquemin v. Finnegan, New York County Courts1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API