Legal Opinion

J.I. Case Co. v. Henley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 7, 1988No. 71106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We review Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer a certified question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified question is as follows:

DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?

510 So.2d at 343. We recently answered the question in the affirmative in Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 515 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1987). We quash the decision below on the authority of Pait.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pait v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Henley v. JI Case CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Navistar International Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Company v. PineroSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API