J.I. Case Co. v. Henley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We review Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), to answer a certified question of great public importance. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. The certified question is as follows:
DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION WHERE THE DEATH OCCURRED MORE THAN TWELVE YEARS AFTER THE ORIGINAL PURCHASE OF THE PRODUCT WHICH ALLEGEDLY CAUSED THE DEATH?
510 So.2d at 343. We recently answered the question in the affirmative in Pait v. Ford Motor Co., 515 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1987). We quash the decision below on the authority of Pait.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pait v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Henley v. JI Case CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Navistar International Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. PineroSupreme Court of Florida · 1988