Legal Opinion

Schmalstig v. Conner

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 21, 1942No. Civil 332PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRUFFEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring their action against defendant seeking a refund of $34,817.42 with interest alleging that the same was erroneously and illegally assessed and collected by reason of the fact that the sum so paid was computed and paid on a net estate subject to tax without allowance of administration expenses of $118,012.67 for attorney fees, contrary to the provisions of Section 303 of the Revenue Act of 1926, Section 812 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code § 812.

The cause was submitted on agreed stipulation of facts after argument. It appears that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fifth-Third Union Trust Co. v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Schreiner v. Cincinnati AltenheimOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mosells Silvey Pitner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Swayne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  4. Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Mary Lee Cadden, of the Estate of George A. Burnett, Deceased v. Russell A. Welch, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API