Schmalstig v. Conner
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DRUFFEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring their action against defendant seeking a refund of $34,817.42 with interest alleging that the same was erroneously and illegally assessed and collected by reason of the fact that the sum so paid was computed and paid on a net estate subject to tax without allowance of administration expenses of $118,012.67 for attorney fees, contrary to the provisions of Section 303 of the Revenue Act of 1926, Section 812 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev. Code § 812.
The cause was submitted on agreed stipulation of facts after argument. It appears that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fifth-Third Union Trust Co. v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
- Schreiner v. Cincinnati AltenheimOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mosells Silvey Pitner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Swayne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
- Dulles v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Mary Lee Cadden, of the Estate of George A. Burnett, Deceased v. Russell A. Welch, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.