State v. Cockerham
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
GENOVESE, J., would grant for the reasons assigned by Judge Holdridge.
CRICHTON, J., would grant in part and assigns reasons:
*1036As Judge Holdridge notes in his dissent below, without an amendment to the habitual offender bill of information by the district attorney, the district court was limited to sentencing the defendant as a third-felony offender. I agree and would therefore reverse the fourth-felony adjudication and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
2Cited by12 opinions
- State Of Louisiana v. Andrew Jerome FrancisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
- State Of Louisiana v. Anthony Joseph ChaneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- State Of Louisiana v. BJ McElveenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
- State Of Louisiana v. Benjamin BaileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- State Of Louisiana v. Fitzpatrick P. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.